Best ERP for financial services: the scored rankings

The strongest ERP fits for financial services companies as of July 2026 are Sage Intacct, NetSuite, and Rillet, from 16 systems rated 1-5 for this industry against our deep profiles. The Investment Adviser Association counted 16,544 SEC-registered advisers in 2025 with regulatory assets up 22.3 percent to $176.8 trillion, and the Big I counts 39,000 independent P&C agencies, 1 in 3 expecting an ownership change within five years. Roll-up economics drive the ERP moment: the selection usually starts the day spreadsheet consolidation fails an audit or a lender.

Last reviewed 2026-07-14·Scoring methodology·No vendor pays for placement

Who this page covers

Financial Services is not one market. The verdicts below are written across these sub-verticals, and where a rating splits by sub-vertical the evidence says so:

Independent insurance agencies and brokerages (P&C and benefits), including PE-backed roll-upsRIAs, wealth managers, and multi-family officesFintechs: payments, lending, and banking-adjacent software companiesSpecialty and non-bank lendersFund managers (VC, PE, credit) and the GP entity stacks behind themOut of scope: banks and credit unions, whose general ledger follows the core processing system (FIS, Fiserv, Jack Henry) rather than a mid-market ERP shortlist

When you do not need an ERP

Below roughly five entities, the working stack is a specialist in front of QuickBooks Online: Applied Epic or AgencyBloc for agencies, Addepar beside the ledger for RIAs, Carta or a fund administrator keeping fund books for emerging managers. The vertical work (commission reconciliation, portfolio performance, fund accounting) never moves into the ERP anyway.

The pattern breaks with acquisition count: a few closed deals put consolidation, intercompany, and lender covenant reporting past what per-entity QuickBooks files can produce, and auditors or minority investors force the move. Sage Intacct is the default landing spot, NetSuite the heavyweight choice at scale, and the AI-native ledgers (Rillet, Campfire) credible for the fintech slice specifically.

The full specialist roster, with pricing and boundaries, is further down this page.

All 16 systems, ranked for financial services

Ratings are 1-5 for this industry specifically, anchored to our deep system profiles. Where an industry rating deviates from a system's cross-industry rating, the evidence explains why. Expand any row for the evidence and caveats.

1Sage Intacct
●●●●●
The default general ledger for mid-market financial services and the strongest fit of the 16. Agency roll-ups, RIAs, and fund management companies land here when QuickBooks runs out.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 5: push-button consolidation across dozens of entities replacing spreadsheets, with automated intercompany due-to/due-from entries. Financial services is a listed strong-fit industry in our matching data, and the profile's best-fit prose names family offices and PE-backed roll-ups explicitly, the exact buyers on this page.
Caveats
Intacct brings no vertical artifacts: carrier commission reconciliation stays in the AMS, portfolio performance in Addepar or similar, fund-side books with the administrator. Buy through a partner who has done agency or fund-management deployments, and get the dimension design right up front; reworking it later is the common regret.
2NetSuite
●●●●●
The heavyweight generalist choice. OneWorld consolidation and FX are the actual requirement in this vertical, and fintechs plus diversified financial groups at scale land on it.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 5 (up to roughly 250 subsidiaries, 190+ currencies, automated eliminations in one database) and revenueBilling 4. Financial services is not in NetSuite's strong-fit industry list in our matching data; we rate 4 anyway because this vertical buys on consolidation, intercompany, and revenue depth rather than vertical artifacts, and those are precisely the profile's strengths.
Caveats
Cost and implementation weight are the tradeoff against Intacct and the modern ledgers. No AMS, no portfolio ops, no fund accounting; SuiteBilling does not reconcile carrier commission statements. Strongest case: a fintech or FS group past roughly $50M revenue with operational complexity beyond pure finance.
3Rillet
●●●●●
The modern ledger with a genuine financial services claim, specifically fintechs. For a venture-backed fintech's GL it is a real alternative to NetSuite.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Financial services is a listed strong-fit industry in our matching data with industryDepth flagged. Deep profile rates revenueBilling 5 and multiEntityConsolidation 4, and its best-fit prose centers billing data from Stripe driving revenue schedules automatically, which is the fintech revenue pattern in one sentence.
Caveats
The claim is the fintech slice only; insurance agencies, RIAs, and fund managers gain nothing vertical here. Young vendor risk is real ($70M Series B in 2025 at a reported $500M valuation). Loan-level accounting and fund accounting are out of scope; check references at your transaction volume.
4Intuit Enterprise Suite
●●●●●
A plausible landing spot for an agency or advisory roll-up that wants to stay inside Intuit. Multi-entity is why it exists; commission revenue is where it stops.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 4: single login across entities, intercompany transactions with automatic matching entries, and due-to/due-from eliminations, far beyond QBO's file-per-entity model. revenueBilling is rated 2, and financial services is not a listed strong-fit industry, which caps the rating at 3.
Caveats
No commission reconciliation, no ASC 606 engine, and the intercompany module is young and still gaining basics each release. The implementer bench is thin; reference-check the specific team. Best case: an AMS keeps doing the vertical work and IES only has to be the consolidated ledger.
5QuickBooks
●●●●●
Weak standalone, but the default ledger under an AMS, a portfolio platform, or a fund administrator. That pairing is the most common working stack in this industry at small scale.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 1: one file per entity with no consolidation. We rate industry fit 3, above the domain rating, because the specialist-plus-QuickBooks pattern (Applied Epic or AgencyBloc feeding QBO, Carta or an administrator handling fund books beside it) is a legitimate recommendation below roughly five entities, and this page's specialist roster exists to support it.
Caveats
The ceiling arrives with the first few acquisitions or entities: no consolidation, no intercompany automation, no audit-grade controls. Auditors, lenders, and minority investors force the move, usually to Intacct or IES.
6Campfire
●●●●●
The same fintech-shaped claim as Rillet from a younger company. Credible for a lean fintech finance team, unproven beyond it.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Financial services is a listed strong-fit industry in our matching data with industryDepth flagged. Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 4 and revenueBilling 4 (ASC 606 plus subscription, usage, and milestone billing). Rated one notch below Rillet here, consistent with our SaaS page, on track record and revenue-engine depth.
Caveats
Young vendor (YC S23, roughly $103.5M raised through 2025) with a short reference list; check references at your scale and volume. Fintech only: nothing here for agencies, RIAs, or fund managers.
7DualEntry
●●●●●
The multi-entity pitch fits agency and advisory roll-ups on paper, and financial services is in its stated target market. The vertical evidence is thinner than the pitch.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Financial services is a listed strong-fit industry in our matching data. Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 4 with automated intercompany netting and unlimited currencies, and its best-fit prose names PE-backed roll-ups adding entities fast, which is the agency roll-up shape exactly.
Caveats
No commission or fee artifacts, and we found no public FS reference customers; ask for one in your sub-vertical before shortlisting. Young vendor risk applies. The unlimited-users, entity-based pricing model is genuinely attractive for roll-ups if the references check out.
8Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
●●●●●
A workable generalist with partner help, and quietly present in this industry's plumbing. Nobody buys bare BC for financial services, but the chassis holds the workload.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 3: capable but batch-flavored next to Intacct and NetSuite. Supporting evidence that the platform carries FS workloads: Allvue built its fund accounting platform on Business Central and Azure. Financial services is not a listed strong-fit industry in our matching data.
Caveats
Consolidation and intercompany take more configuration than Intacct to reach the same place. Commission and fee handling is ISV or custom territory, and the qualified FS partner pool is a narrow subset of a huge channel. Strongest case: a Microsoft-committed firm with an existing Dynamics partner relationship.
9Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
●●●●●
Enterprise-grade consolidation for the top of this market: insurer corporate ledgers and diversified financial groups, not mid-market agencies or funds.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 5, and the product's cost and complexity aim at organizations well past $100M revenue. Rated 3 because the capability is real but the fit window barely overlaps the buyers on this page.
Caveats
Below roughly $250M revenue the implementation weight is disqualifying. Vertical artifacts are still absent, and at the tier where F&O fits, Workday Financials and Oracle are the usual competition with stronger FS reference bases.
10Light
●●●●●
A multi-entity ledger with a Europe-first startup focus and no financial services story.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 4 (multi-entity, multi-currency, native eliminations) but revenueBilling 2 with no public rev-rec engine, which is why subscription_billing and advanced_revenue are deliberately absent from its capability list in our matching data. Financial services is not among its listed industries.
Caveats
Young vendor, European center of gravity, and no fee or commission handling. A US agency, RIA, or fund manager has no reason to shortlist it today.
11Acumatica
●●●●●
A strong product pointed at the wrong verticals for this page. Its editions are construction, distribution, and manufacturing; financial services is not on the list.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 4, so the mechanics exist, but there is no FS edition, no vertical artifacts, and financial services is not a listed strong-fit industry in our matching data.
Caveats
The plausible edge case is a holding group where FS sits next to operational businesses Acumatica serves well (a contractor group with an in-house insurance agency, for example). Standalone FS buyers should look at Intacct first.
12Odoo
●●●●●
A cheap general ledger for a very small shop, with nothing vertical and consolidation that runs thin exactly where this industry needs it most.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 2. The suite's strength is operational apps (CRM, inventory, ecommerce) that FS buyers do not need, and financial services is not a listed strong-fit industry.
Caveats
A two-entity agency on a tight budget can make it work with partner help, but the all-in cost of customizing intercompany and commission workflows usually erases the license savings.
13Priority ERP
●●●●●
Capable core financials with no US financial services presence. Pass unless there is an unusual existing tie.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 4, so an entity roll-up is mechanically possible, but its verticals are manufacturing, distribution, retail, healthcare, and construction; financial services is not a listed strong-fit industry and we found no US FS reference base.
Caveats
Strongest case remains a company with international or Israeli operations already in the Priority ecosystem. Commission, fee, and fund workflows would all be custom.
14SAP Business One
●●●●●
A product-centric SMB suite with no financial services story.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 2, and nothing in the profile or vendor material addresses commission accounting, fee billing, or fund structures. The product's center of gravity is inventory and light manufacturing, none of which exists here.
Caveats
Localized partner add-ons exist in some markets; treat any US pitch of B1 for financial services as a custom build wearing an ERP badge.
15Epicor
●●●●●
Manufacturing and distribution DNA, nothing for financial services.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 3 in service of plants and branches, not GP stacks or agency roll-ups. Financial services appears nowhere in its target industries, and we found no FS reference base.
Caveats
None; category mismatch.
16Infor CloudSuite
●●●●●
Infor's CloudSuites are industry-specific and none of them is financial services.
Evidence & caveats
What supports this rating
Deep profile rates multiEntityConsolidation 3 across products aimed at manufacturing, distribution, and healthcare. At Infor's deal size an FS buyer would be evaluating Workday or Oracle, not retrofitting a manufacturing suite.
Caveats
None; category mismatch.

What actually matters in this industry

Capability priorities for financial services buyers, from our fit model. Vendors demo everything; these are the areas where depth decides outcomes.

Critical

Multi-entity & consolidation: Entity count is the defining variable in this vertical. Agency roll-ups add LLCs with every acquisition, RIAs split advisory and holdco entities, and a fund manager's GP stack (management company, GP entities, special purpose vehicles) multiplies on its own. The selection usually starts the day spreadsheet consolidation fails an audit or a lender.
Intercompany transactions: Management fees, shared services allocations, and due-to/due-from balances run constantly between entities in every sub-vertical here. Automated intercompany entries and eliminations are the difference between a close and a forensic project; this is the capability to demo hardest.

Important

Complex revenue recognition: Revenue here means fees and commissions, not subscriptions. Agencies recognize commission revenue under ASC 606 including estimated contingent commissions, RIAs bill fees calculated in the portfolio system, and fintechs recognize usage-based revenue from processor data. No horizontal ERP reconciles carrier commission statements natively; that stays with the AMS or a specialist.
Multi-currency: Funds with offshore feeders (Cayman is routine), international fintech entities, and cross-border brokerage groups need currency translation and FX-aware consolidation. Domestic-only agencies and RIAs can deprioritize this.
High transaction volumes: Fintechs and specialty lenders generate processor-level and loan-level line volume that should post to the GL summarized, with detail kept in a subledger or data warehouse. The ERP question is whether summarized journals plus drill-back are supported cleanly, not whether the GL can hold every transaction.

Rarely decisive here: Subscription / recurring billing, Inventory management. Do not pay for depth in these unless your sub-vertical is the exception the page notes.

What sends financial services companies shopping

1
A PE-backed insurance brokerage closes its fourth agency acquisition of the year, the AMS general ledger cannot consolidate the new entities, and month-end becomes a spreadsheet exercise the lender's reporting covenants no longer tolerate.
2
Direct-bill commission statements arrive from dozens of carriers in dozens of formats, and reconciling them to revenue and producer payouts eats the first two weeks of every month in Excel.
3
An RIA approaching $1B AUM has an advisory entity, a holdco, and partner-owned LLCs, each in its own QuickBooks file, and the spreadsheet consolidation stops surviving the auditor or a minority-stake investor's diligence.
4
A Series B fintech's payment processor settles daily at line volumes QuickBooks cannot absorb, and the first GAAP audit demands revenue recognition and reconciliation the current stack cannot show.
5
A fund administrator keeps clean fund-side books while the management company ledger (fee income, carry accruals, GP entities) lives in QuickBooks plus spreadsheets, and a new CFO inherits intercompany balances nobody can tie out.
6
A credit or venture fund adds an offshore feeder or a non-USD vehicle, and currency translation plus eliminations across the GP stack outgrow the manual workpapers.
7
A specialty lender's loan system tracks the book at loan level while the GL gets one summary journal a month, and a warehouse lender's field exam flags the gap.

The specialists: 6 systems ERPs compete against

These are not scored by our ERP methodology; they are curated from our industry research, verified for ownership, pricing posture, and current availability as of July 2026. The boundary fields matter most: every one of these tools ends somewhere, and that boundary is where ERP decisions actually get made.

insurance agency management system (AMS)

Applied Epic (Applied Systems)

Applied Epic is the market-leading agency management system for P&C and benefits agencies: policy administration, carrier connectivity, commission tracking, and a built-in agency accounting module with its own general ledger. Applied Systems says seven of the ten largest insurance agencies are standardized on Epic, and it operates across the US, Canada, the UK, and Ireland (vendor claims, appliedsystems.com, fetched July 2026).

Best for:: P&C and benefits agencies from a few million in revenue to large regional brokerages that need policy workflow, carrier downloads, and commission tracking in one system. It is the incumbent choice; the main alternative at this tier is Vertafore's AMS360.
Not for:: Fintechs, RIAs, or fund managers; it is insurance-agency software, full stop. Also wrong as the corporate finance system for a multi-entity brokerage roll-up, even though its GL tempts buyers to try.
Where it ends:: Unusually for a specialist, Epic contains a real general ledger, and single-entity agencies do run their books in it. Where it ends is corporate finance at roll-up scale: multi-entity consolidation across acquired agencies, dimensional reporting, payroll, and lender-grade covenant reporting. Growing brokerages typically keep Epic for agency billing and trust accounting and consolidate in QuickBooks, Intacct, or NetSuite above it.
Pricing:: Quote-based; Undisclosed. Third-party review sites publish rough per-user estimates for 2026 but they diverge widely; treat anything short of a quote as unreliable.
Pairs with:: QuickBooks Sage Intacct NetSuite

Ownership & sources

Ownership: Hellman & Friedman (majority since 2014, in a transaction valued near $1.8 billion buying from Bain Capital), with JMI Equity, Stone Point Capital (minority, 2017), and Alphabet's growth fund CapitalG (minority, 2018) alongside.

agency management and commissions platform for life, health, and benefits agencies

AgencyBloc

AgencyBloc is the AMS and CRM for the life, health, senior-market, and benefits side of the agency world, where Applied and Vertafore are weakest. Its AMS+ core carries policy and client management, and its Commissions+ module ingests carrier commission statements, matches them to policies, and calculates producer payouts. It served nearly 3,000 agencies at the 2021 investment and acquired the Radius CRM in early 2023.

Best for:: Health, Medicare, and benefits agencies from solo shops to mid-sized firms whose operational pain is carrier commission reconciliation and producer comp. Commissions+ automates the exact spreadsheet grind that fills the first two weeks of an agency's month.
Not for:: P&C-centric agencies (Applied and Vertafore territory), and anyone expecting it to keep the books. It is also not built for the brokerage roll-up's corporate consolidation problem.
Where it ends:: The commissions module tracks, reconciles, and calculates; it does not post a general ledger. Books, payroll, and financial statements live in QuickBooks or whatever ledger the agency runs, and commission data crosses that boundary by export. The AMS is not a GL.
Pricing:: Quote-based. The published pricing page lists three AMS+ tiers (Grow, Accelerate, Elevate) with features but no dollar figures; Commissions+ and Quote+ are priced on transaction and group volume (agencybloc.com/pricing, fetched July 2026).
Pairs with:: QuickBooks

Ownership & sources

Ownership: Resurgens Technology Partners (software private equity; platform investment announced October 2021). Founded 2008, headquartered in Cedar Falls, Iowa.

portfolio data, performance, and reporting for wealth managers (adjacency, not a ledger)

Addepar

Addepar is the portfolio operations platform for RIAs, family offices, and private banks: data aggregation across custodians and alternatives, performance calculation, and client reporting. As of its May 2025 Series G it reported more than $7 trillion in client assets on platform across 1,200-plus firms in over 50 countries (company figures). It appears on this page because wealth managers regularly conflate the portfolio book of record with the firm's own accounting, and they are different systems.

Best for:: RIAs and family offices with complex or alternatives-heavy portfolios that have outgrown custodian reporting and spreadsheet performance calcs. For the investment side of the house it is the premium default.
Not for:: The firm's own books. Addepar tracks client portfolios, not the advisory firm's P&L. Small advisors on a single custodian may also find lighter tools (Orion, Black Diamond) sufficient at lower cost.
Where it ends:: The firm ledger. Fee billing calculated from portfolio data becomes receivables and revenue in the accounting system; payroll, entity consolidation, and the management company's financial statements happen in QuickBooks or Intacct, not Addepar. It is a portfolio book of record beside the GL, never a replacement for it.
Pricing:: Undisclosed. Quote-based platform fees widely reported to scale with accounts and assets on platform; no reliable public ranges (low confidence).
Pairs with:: QuickBooks Sage Intacct

Ownership & sources

Ownership: Private and venture-backed: $230 million Series G in May 2025 at a $3.25 billion valuation, led by Vitruvian Partners and WestCap with 8VC and Valor Equity participating; co-founded by Joe Lonsdale.

fund accounting and portfolio monitoring for private capital GPs

Allvue Systems

Allvue is the mid-market-and-up fund accounting platform for private equity, venture, credit, and CLO managers: fund GL, capital calls and distributions, waterfall calculations, portfolio monitoring, and an investor portal. Formed in 2019 when Vista Equity Partners bought AltaReturn (reported $500 million) and merged it with portfolio company Black Mountain Systems; the vendor reports over 21,000 funds on platform. Notably, the platform is built on Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Azure.

Best for:: GPs from roughly $500M to tens of billions in AUM that want fund accounting in-house rather than fully outsourced, or that need portfolio monitoring and LP reporting tied to the fund books. Credit and CLO managers are a particular strength from the Black Mountain side.
Not for:: Emerging managers on fund one or two, where Carta-style outsourced administration is faster and cheaper, and anyone whose actual problem is the management company ledger rather than fund books.
Where it ends:: Fund-side accounting. The management company (fee income, payroll, GP entities, the office lease) still needs its own general ledger, and that is where Intacct, NetSuite, or QuickBooks sit beside Allvue. It is also an enterprise-weight purchase; implementation and annual cost land far above mid-market ERP norms.
Pricing:: Quote-based; Undisclosed. Expect enterprise contracts; six figures annually at its target GP sizes is an inference from the market it serves, not a published figure.
Pairs with:: QuickBooks Sage Intacct NetSuite

Ownership & sources

Ownership: Vista Equity Partners (since the September 2019 formation from AltaReturn and Black Mountain Systems). Headquartered in Miami.

outsourced fund administration and software for venture funds and SPVs

Carta Fund Administration

Carta, the cap table company, runs a fund administration business aimed at venture funds and SPVs: fund accounting, NAV, capital calls, distributions, K-1 preparation, and audit support, delivered as software plus a service team the company says exceeds 400 people. Carta reports supporting 9,000 funds and SPVs representing more than $203 billion in assets under administration (vendor figures, 2026).

Best for:: Emerging and mid-sized venture managers, especially those already on Carta for cap tables, who want fund books, LP workflows, and tax handled by one provider instead of hiring a fund accountant on fund one.
Not for:: Buyout, credit, and hedge strategies with complex waterfalls or trading books; that is Allvue, SS&C, and traditional administrator territory. Also not for GPs that want fund accounting in-house on their own ledger.
Where it ends:: The fund entities. The management company's own books (fees received, salaries, rent, GP entity accounting) are outside the core service; Carta sells a separate management company administration add-on, and many GPs simply run that ledger in QuickBooks or Intacct. Contract terms deserve attention: third-party reviews report onboarding fees and annual price escalators.
Pricing:: Quoted per fund. Third-party trackers in 2026 report starting points near $1,500 per month for emerging funds, typical emerging-fund spend of $2K-$3K per month scaling with AUM, LP count, and entity complexity, onboarding and migration fees of $2K-$10K+, and 5-10 percent annual escalators reported in contracts (moderate confidence; Vendr and Archstone 2026 writeups).
Pairs with:: QuickBooks Sage Intacct

Ownership & sources

Ownership: Private and venture-backed: $500 million Series G in August 2021 led by Silver Lake at a $7.4 billion valuation; earlier investors include Andreessen Horowitz, Spark Capital, and Menlo Ventures. No primary round since, so treat the 2021 mark as dated.

institutional fund administration and portfolio accounting (heavyweight adjacency)

SS&C Technologies (GlobeOp, Advent, Geneva)

SS&C is the institutional incumbent this market graduates into: GlobeOp fund administration, the Advent portfolio accounting line (Advent Portfolio Exchange, Black Diamond, and Geneva, acquired with Advent Software in 2015 for roughly $2.7 billion), plus transfer agency and insurance platforms. It reported record Q4 2025 revenue of $1.65 billion, up 8.1 percent, in February 2026. It appears here as an adjacency marker, the same role FIS and Fiserv play for banks: when a firm reaches institutional scale, its accounting moves into this ecosystem, not a mid-market ERP.

Best for:: Hedge funds, large asset managers, and fund administrators at institutional scale; Geneva remains the reference portfolio accounting system for complex hedge strategies. RIAs meet SS&C most often through Black Diamond, its wealth-tier portfolio platform.
Not for:: Mid-market agencies, fintechs, and emerging fund managers. Nothing in the SS&C stack is priced, implemented, or supported for a 20-person finance-adjacent firm, and buying it early is a common and expensive form of resume-driven selection.
Where it ends:: For this page's buyers it does not begin. The honest use of SS&C in a mid-market selection is as a boundary: if your requirements genuinely need Geneva or GlobeOp, you have left the mid-market ERP conversation entirely; if they do not, do not let an institutional pitch inflate the project. Corporate ledgers at SS&C-scale firms typically run Workday, Oracle, or NetSuite beside the fund platforms.
Pricing:: Quote-based; Undisclosed. Enterprise contracts.
Pairs with:: Nothing. It replaces the ledger rather than pairing with one.

Ownership & sources

Ownership: SS&C Technologies Holdings (public, NASDAQ: SSNC); founded and still led by Bill Stone.

Numbers worth citing

Citable stat · as of 2026-07-14
The Investment Adviser Association's 2026 Industry Snapshot counted 16,544 SEC-registered investment advisers in 2025, with regulatory assets under management up 22.3 percent to $176.8 trillion (investmentadviser.org, June 2026 release).

Citable stat · as of 2026-07-14
The Big I's 2024 Agency Universe Study estimated 39,000 independent property and casualty agencies in the US, down from 40,000 in 2022, with 1 in 3 agencies expecting an ownership change within five years (independentagent.com).

Citable stat · as of 2026-07-14
Addepar raised a $230 million Series G at a $3.25 billion valuation in May 2025 and reported more than $7 trillion in client assets on platform across 1,200-plus firms, up from $5 trillion a year earlier (company announcement, prnewswire.com).

Citable stat · as of 2026-07-14
CB Insights' State of Fintech 2025 report put global venture-backed fintech funding at $52.7 billion in 2025, the first annual increase after four consecutive down years (cbinsights.com).

Citable stat · as of 2026-07-14
SS&C Technologies reported record Q4 2025 revenue of $1.65 billion, up 8.1 percent year over year, in its February 5, 2026 release; fund administration keeps consolidating onto institutional providers while management company ledgers stay on mid-market systems (ssctech.com).

Citable stat · as of 2026-07-14
Carta's fund administration platform reported supporting 9,000 funds and SPVs representing more than $203 billion in assets under administration as of 2026 (vendor figures, carta.com).

Where does your company land?

The free assessment scores all 16 systems against your size, sub-vertical signals, and requirements, with the reasoning shown. Ten minutes, no sales call.

Score the systems for your company →

Best ERP for financial services: common questions

What is the best ERP for financial services companies?

Sage Intacct, NetSuite, and Rillet lead our financial services rankings as of July 2026. The default general ledger for mid-market financial services and the strongest fit of the 16. Ratings are anchored to our published system profiles, and every deviation from a system's cross-industry rating is explained on this page.

When does a financial services company not need an ERP?

When does the specialist-plus-QuickBooks stack stop working in financial services?

Which specialist systems should financial services companies evaluate?

6 specialists made our verified roster as of July 2026: Applied Epic (Applied Systems), AgencyBloc, Addepar, Allvue Systems, Carta Fund Administration, and SS&C Technologies (GlobeOp, Advent, Geneva). Each is profiled on this page with what it is, who it fits, who it does not, and exactly where it ends, because the boundary is where buying mistakes happen.

Shortlisting later? Email yourself this page.

One email: the link to this page. Nothing else.

Sources (11), researched 2026-07-14

This page is educational decision support, not legal, accounting, or implementation advice. Specialist listings are research, not endorsements; no vendor pays for placement. Product capabilities and pricing change with vendor releases; verify current functionality in demos scripted around your own scenarios.